The case of judges price tolls to be accountable, the trial judge removed

 15 days, under the charge Zhanfuzhanzhang Li Zhanfeng said Tom did not know when the International Tourism and brothers. 16, Li Zhanfeng recognize application of such personnel, and eat rice 3 times, still does not recognize the income over 5,000 yuan per month.

view of the front when the army surrendered to the public security organs, changes in facts and evidence, according to relevant provisions of the Municipal People's Procuratorate Pingdingshan Committee decided that the withdrawal of the case prosecuted by the public security organ for supplementary investigation. Other issues involved in the case, the prosecution will be based on the law seriously punished.

when the military front view (front of the building when the younger brother), surrendered to the public security organs, Pingdingshan City People's Procuratorate, the Committee decided to withdraw the case prosecuted by the public security organ for supplementary investigation.

(journalist Liu Di Zhu Chu toward new)

Pingdingshan City of Henan Provincial High Court that the Court party in the trial, the case of fraud when the construction front, there is no review fine control is lax and so on. Pingdingshan City Court instructed the Henan Provincial High Court, Pingdingshan Municipal write checks on Pingdingshan City Court criticized the court system in Henan Province.

Pingdingshan City Court building when the front of the case retrial, the defendant confessed his brother when Jianfeng Feng involved in common crime when the military situation is be notified to the police, prosecutors.

  accountability for the situation related personnel. When Jianfeng Lou Yanwei case the trial judge be removed from office assistant judge, removed from the trial position, Pingdingshan City Criminal Court dismissed a President of the Court Hou Xiaohong.

changes in the prosecution of cases nolle prosequi

Pingdingshan City Court has been criticized



the Judicial Committee of Henan Provincial High Court that, based on available evidence, Pingdingshan City Court found the fact that when the construction of ambiguous criminal front, lack of evidence, mainly in the building when the front is involved in crime, and whether others common crime and the role in the crime, what other position.